Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
The Colosseum Sports Forum - The Arena of Entertainment - - - Don't feed the posters in Cricket - you'll lose your arm up to the elbow.
Welcome to The Colosseum Sports Forum - Arena of Entertainment

9/10 muppets agree, this is the best online sports forum ever.

A place to talk sport and shit!



Click Here to Join The Colosseum Sports Forum


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
NRL Ladder 2009
Topic Started: Mar 17 2009, 07:01 AM (483 Views)
Ser
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  * ]
NRL Ladder 2009
TeamPlayedWinLossDrawForAgainstDiffByePoints
St George Illawarra211650503276227236
Canterbury211650495370125234*
Gold Coast21147045439559232
Melbourne201271407298109229
Wests Tigers211110048240973226
Manly211110047342350226
Brisbane2111100461544-83226
Penrith2110101469496-27225
Parramatta2110101402412-10225
North Queensland211011049041080224
Newcastle2010100401421-20224
South Sydney219111489479-10223
Canberra218130429450-21220
New Zealand216132323475-152218
Cronulla215160309504-195214
Sydney City215160358583-225214


I'll try to keep this updated, but I am often not able to get online and also have the S12 & AFL ladders (all will recieve equal time! If 1 get's update - all will, if I miss one for a week - all will be missed!)

RED = yet to play
* Loss of points for fielding 14 players in RND2. Pending appeal.
Edited by Ser, Aug 17 2009, 03:15 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meljas
Member Avatar
Ernie Dingo Hit My Baby
[ *  *  *  * ]
Upside down Miss Jane?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Seaney
Member Avatar
Flush
[ *  *  * ]
enjoy it while you can souths
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nick'o
Member Avatar
Resident Golfer
[ *  *  *  * ]
winning 34-26 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. winning 18-10 :nono:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ser
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  * ]
Nick'o
Mar 17 2009, 11:05 AM
winning 34-26 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. winning 18-10 :nono:
Weighted for points against. You make it higher up the ladder based on a better defence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mickdog
Member Avatar
Bulldog for life
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ser
Mar 18 2009, 01:12 AM
Nick'o
Mar 17 2009, 11:05 AM
winning 34-26 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. winning 18-10 :nono:
Weighted for points against. You make it higher up the ladder based on a better defence.
They do that the other way around ormally. If points differential is even, then for if equal then against if equal trys scored
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ace
Member Avatar
Let's play!
[ *  *  * ]
Shouldn't Brisbane be ahead of Melbourne having scored more points?

Yeah, what Mick said. I've only ever seen them differentiate based on points scored, not points conceded.
Edited by Ace, Mar 19 2009, 10:47 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ser
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ace
Mar 19 2009, 10:46 AM
Shouldn't Brisbane be ahead of Melbourne having scored more points?

Yeah, what Mick said. I've only ever seen them differentiate based on points scored, not points conceded.
NRL.com have just changed to this format, I'm simply following their lead.

It appears that, for the winning teams, the onus is on defensive points conceded to seperate teams but for losing sides they get rewarded for a better attack.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nick'o
Member Avatar
Resident Golfer
[ *  *  *  * ]
when did penrith get 2 points :laury:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Rugby League · Next Topic »
Add Reply